Why Technical Analysis Always Fails in the End

By Boris Schlossberg • June 8th, 2012
Boris Schlossberg

When you think about it, there are really really only two ways to trade. You can trade statistically or you can trade analytically. All technical trading is in fact statistical in nature. Whenever you are coding a technically based system you are basically saying -- If A occurs do B and over 100 or 1000 or 1 million samples I will succeed because according to past price behavior my profits will exceed losses.


That’s it. That’s all that technical trading comes down to. And therein lies the problem. Modelling past behaviour successfully is extraordinary difficult. Mark Twain once said that history does not repeat itself by rhymes. The same can be said for the markets. Unfortunately those rhymes can contain just enough of a difference to turn profitable strategies into losers. Ultimately that is what happens to all good technical ideas from such simple algos as Dogs of the Dow to much more complex strategies like stat arbitrage.

Analytical strategies on the other hand don’t suffer from this fate but they have problems of their own. If you think about the great hedge fund managers of our time most of them follow the analytical model. But while the weakness of statistics is that it applies a consistent approach to an ever changing environment, the problem of analytics is to produce consistent accuracy in judgement which extraordinarily hard to do. For one George Soros there are a million John Paulson’s -- guys who are good for a year or two , but who flame out with the destructive intensity of the worst of the MT-4 robots.

So what’s the answer? Hell if I know. At its core trading is about price and price behavior, so a statistical understanding of price action is paramount if you want to succeed. But it is not enough. Ultimately I believe that every stat strategy must have an analytical overlay. The more I trade my strategies the more I realize that the key to success has less to do with taking trades and much more to do with NOT taking them.

The NOT taking part is the really difficult aspect of trading because this is where the analytics come in. The computer is a dumb machine. It does not understand context, that why trusting all your money to a computer is idiotic. Judgement is crucial if you want to thrive and survive which is why purely technically based systems always fail in the end.


Leave a Comment

« | Home | »

Trader Education Live Session Schedule

Everyday at 9am ET/ 13 GMT

  • Monday Morning Game Plan
  • Technical Analysis Tuesday
  • World Markets Wednesday
  • Strategy Think Tank Thursday
  • Trader Therapy Friday
Join Today
Trade Results
Forget EUR/CHF – Here is How Everyone Really Loses Money in FX

January 23, 2015 • by: Boris Schlossberg

The Trend is not Your Friend

January 17, 2015 • by: Boris Schlossberg

see all posts by Boris Schlossberg
EUR/CHF Drops Below 1.21 – First Since Jan 2012

August 15, 2014 • by: Kathy Lien

EUR/CHF Drops Below 1.21 – First Since Jan 2012

August 15, 2014 • by: Kathy Lien

see all posts by Kathy Lien

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Trading forex carries a high level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you. Before deciding to trade any such leveraged products you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with trading on margin, and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.

copyright notice | terms of service | terms of use | website policy